texstudio looking for wrong version of texlive

#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE FULL#

Therefore, a very quick test to see if you’ve got organization issues is to check your topic sentences: the first sentence of your paragraph tells your reader what the paragraph is about, and every sentence should serve that topic sentence in some way. The sequence of your topic sentences should represent the roadmap of your paper. Furthermore, topic sentences are useful to diagnose structural problems in writing. Topic sentences help your reader to follow your writing. Your paragraph lacks of a topic sentence.Įach paragraph should have a topic sentence anticipating the main message of the paragraph. “This is a problem, because…” What’s the problem?ĥ. In scientific writing, this problem (haha, see what I did there?) often happens in the beginning of sentences and paragraphs. Remember that your readers aren’t in your head, and the connections may not be intuitive. When you find yourself writing “this,” check to make sure that “this” is clearly linked to an antecedent. That doesn’t mean the initial writing was wasted – it’s all part of what got you to cleaner, stronger prose. Cutting words/texts is part of the writing process, and sometimes it’s the most effective way to make your writing better.

Get comfortable with deleting your writing.

Reading your writing out loud helps (you’re more likely to catch errors than if you skim the page reading to yourself).

If you’re revising your own work, you should be catching the places of redundant text parts.

Redundancy is also usually a symptom of poor organization a lack of structure can lead to circular writing, because you don’t know where you’ve come from and you don’t have a clear sense of where you’re going. I often find myself reading prose that has the same idea presented in multiple ways – sometimes word for word, from one paragraph to the next! Regardless of how this happens, redundancy highlights the importance of taking a break from your work. You keep making the same point over and over again. People often assume the thesaurus will help them sound smarter, but instead leaves your reader thinking, “wow, she/he really loves her/his thesaurus.” Use fun words sparingly, and aim for clarity.

Take opportunities to be creative, but not at the expense of clarity.

When you’re over your word count on an abstract or conclusion section, look to cut sentence padding first, before you start cutting your cool ideas.

Relentlessly go over your prose to remove junk.

“Utilize” is rarely more appropriate than “use.”.

“Highly” isn’t needed in front of “likely.”.

Words like “arguably” or “furthermore” or “thus” rarely do any heavy lifting in sentences, and are often implied anyway.

“It is entirely likely that” can be replaced with a single word (likely): “Your prose is likely…”.

“In order to” is not necessary when “to” will do.

#TEXSTUDIO LOOKING FOR WRONG VERSION OF TEXLIVE FULL#

It’s full of “junk” phrases that serve no purpose whatsoever.It crams too much, abusing semi-colons and parentheses for useless purposes.

Double (or triple)-dipping with adjectives when one would do.

My example sentence above has a few issues: Perhaps a consequence of assigning papers with word counts, text padding is one of the most common issues with student writing, especially for those writing their first manuscripts. Extraneous, superfluous or otherwise unnecessary additions.Įxample of bad writting: It is entirely likely that your prose is padded with extraneous, superfluous, or otherwise unnecessary additions furthermore, the utilization of such redundant verbiage is arguably obfuscating your points (thus, in order to improve the clarity of your writing, it is highly recommended that you eschew such stylistic choices, including run-on sentences filled with fluff, padding, and filler). We are a storytelling species – we like a little drama!Ģ. The active voice is more engaging to read by its very nature, which makes otherwise dry methods sections just a bit less tedious. For instance, “We demonstrate the usefulness of our method” is much nicer to read than “The usefulness of the method is demonstrated”. Why is the active voice better? Because science is an active process, done by human beings: “I” and “we” statements are appropriate when describing action.

results in unnecessarily long sentences and.

This is an understandable mistake, because not only are we taught to write passively in primary and secondary school science classes, but many of my colleagues still cling to the idea that solid, objective scientific writing must be in the passive voice. The following is heavily based on a blog-post of Jacquelyn Gill.

6.3 Rob J Hyndman: Avoid Annoying a Referee.

4.2 Asymptotics under the Classic Regression Model.4.1.4 Hypothesis Testing under Normality.4 Ordinary Least Squares: The Classical Linear Regression Model.3.2 Significance Level, Size and p-Values.2.6.2 Tools for deriving asymptotic distributions.

Texstudio looking for wrong version of texlive